Reducing risks through digital construction

28 August 2019

Reducing risks through digital constructionDigital construction improves conditions for those working on site and reduces the risk of injury. In our latest edition of Building Sight, we look at the increasing focus on wellbeing from a construction perspective such as how it could impact on the built environments we create, how technology is improving occupational health and the risk of psychological injury due to stress.

The drive toward digitalization and automation isn’t just about increasing productivity. It’s also about attracting the next, tech-savvy generation to the industry by making construction sites better places to work.

Already, new technologies are demonstrating the benefits that digital construction could bring to the workforce, whether through the use of robotics, wearable tech, virtual reality (VR), or 3D design.

In this article, we look at some examples and briefly consider what new risks these emerging technologies could introduce.

Any technology that reduces the strain on the human body could make a huge impact. For example, removing humans from back-breaking work can reduce injury risk, with back problems cited as the most common injury in US construction by the Laborers’ Health & Safety Fund of North America.

Tying reinforcing bar (rebar) for steelwork is a case in point. It’s injury-prone and unpopular, and finding enough skilled people to do it is getting harder.

BS06_900x100 fitbit

In 2017, Stephen Muck, owner of Brayman Construction Corporation, which builds bridges, roads, and dams, devised his “TyBot”: an autonomous robotic arm rigged to a gantry, which uses artificial intelligence and machine vision to locate where lengths of rebar need to be tied together at laps.

Muck estimated that the TyBot could save up to 50% of the bridge-deck rebar labor function, so he paid experts to develop a prototype, which demonstrated the concept’s feasibility.

TyBot has since been deployed on bridge projects. In April 2019, a second robot was unveiled (the “IronBot”) which lays rebar, another heavy manual task.

Such machines also bring commercial benefits, says Adrian Pellen, senior vice president and infrastructure segment leader in the US and Canada for Marsh JLT Specialty.

“Workers’ compensation for injury and illness adds significant cost to construction projects, with huge variations among different regions.

“In Canada, construction insurance premiums will typically comprise around 1% of a project’s cost for a large project but, in New York, where workers’ compensation premiums account for a significant portion of all construction insurance, costs can be as much as 12%.”

Raising Awareness

Technologies that heighten worker awareness on site are another fast-developing area. For example, networked wearable devices can monitor a worker’s fatigue or warn that machinery is too close.

Three current examples include: the Spot-r system by Triax, which tracks where workers are, emits alarms, and logs falls; SmartCap, which uses electroencephalography to monitor drowsiness in machinery operators; and Cat Detect, Caterpillar’s proximity detection system for plant.

VR can be used to raise awareness of potential hazards before a worker even gets on site through immersive site-safety training.

The Saskatchewan Construction Safety Association (SCSA) in Canada, an industry-funded training provider, launched “Hazard ID VR” training, which envelops students in a workplace scenario and challenges them to spot hazards in a game format.

“Telling people how to stay safe isn’t enough to overhaul a culture that has historically struggled with safety,” says SCSA president Collin Pullar.

The tool is very popular among young trainees, adds Pullar, which is positive because 25% of injury claims to the Saskatchewan Workers’ Compensation Board involve workers under 25.

Embracing Digitalization

Meanwhile, the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) or advanced 3D modeling can improve how the construction of a building is planned.

As well as helping to avoid scheduling clashes that can lead to rework and unplanned activities, it highlights potentially hazardous works or sequencing to designers and constructors.

For instance, some constructors are using BIM to communicate to teams of workers before they physically start work on site. This helps to identify where the order of work could be improved or interfaces with other trades could cause problems.

Digitalization can increase cyber insecurity, as more of a company’s data floats around in the cloud or is transmitted from device to device. The potential impact to on-site activities could be just as great as for those in the office.

The industry needs to enter a steep cyberlearning curve as it digitizes, Pellen adds. “Insurers look at data on a retroactive basis, but in the aggregate.

The next level up is looking at a basket of different construction projects, particularly around worker injuries, and using prior loss experiences and predictive modeling to figure out where we’re having the losses, including from what geographies and which contractors.

This will help our clients isolate project participants with poor safety performance records, which was more difficult before when just looking at aggregated data.”

For instance, the proprietary web tool Data Navigator, developed by Marsh, provides its clients with unprecedented insight into their construction projects (see box).

Fed by data recorded during an owner-controlled insurance program, Data Navigator provides analytical and predictive modeling based on information including enrolment, safety observations, claims, and past project characteristics. By allowing clients to drill down by project, location, and contractor, the tool has also made it easier to evaluate the performance of particular contractors, enabling targeted efforts to reduce the potential for risk.

“It has been quite successful, especially on large projects in the US where these costs are extraordinary,” says Pellen.

“Data and analytics have allowed us to minimize clients’ full cost of risk and helped to eliminate too many bad apples that are at heightened risk of causing financial loss to projects.”

Data Navigator: a Success Story

A recent analysis of a client’s tiered safety observation system for a large rolling owner-controlled insurance program showed that 24% of its contractor population was receiving an A or B deficiency (all observations were coded A, B, C, or D, with “A” denoting a critical deficiency and “D” being the least onerous).

It was found that these A or B deficiencies were causing 78% of claims frequency and 72% of claims severity.

Not every A or B safety observation resulted in a claim, but the client concluded that a contractor receiving an A or B deficiency could affect overall project safety and its financial outcome.

As a result, A or B negative safety observations were an immediate flag on a contractor’s performance, and alerted the client’s project teams to the need to focus on individual contractors’ performance in order to reduce the potential for loss.




  • Adrian PellenAdrian Pellen

    Adrian Pellen serves as Marsh JLT Specialty’s North American Infrastructure Leader.

    Having worked on over 100 Public Private Partnerships (P3) projects in his career Adrian has been recognized as a leader in promoting the use of P3s in the US and Canada. Adrian has also delivered over 50 speaking engagements on topics ranging emerging tech and cyber risk to infrastructure and environmental risk.

    Adrian was designated as Power Broker ® in 2013, 2014 and 2016 by Risk and Insurance®. He also currently serves as branch council member for the International Project Finance Association (IPFA).

    Prior to joining Marsh in 2016, Adrian spent nearly 10 years at another broker where he last held the role of Director, leading a team of risk consultants for infrastructure projects in the US and Canada. Adrian has also held roles in environmental insurance serving previously as Vice-President and National Practice Leader for Canada (Toronto) and Director for the Greater New York Region.

    If you would like to talk about any of the issues raised in this article, please contract Adrian Pellen on +1 312 627 6146.

  • To view more articles relating to health and well-being in construction, download our

    Share this article

  • Get everything you need, delivered straight to your inbox.

    Sign up to receive Building Sight and other insights here.


Services provided in the United Kingdom by Marsh JLT Specialty, a trading name of Marsh Ltd and JLT Specialty Limited (together “MMC”). Marsh Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for General Insurance Distribution and Credit Broking (Firm Reference No. 307511). JLT Specialty Ltd is a Lloyd’s Broker, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for General Insurance Distribution and Credit Broking (Firm Reference No. 310428).

This is not legal advice and is intended only to highlight general issues relating to its subject matter. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the content of this document, no MMC entity accepts any responsibility for any error, or omission or deficiency. The information contained within this document may not be reproduced. If you are interested in utilising the services of MMC you may be required by/under your local regulatory regime to utilise the services of a local insurance intermediary in your territory to export insurance and (re)insurance to us unless you have an exemption and should take advice in this regard.